Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-21 17:39:11 EDT --- I've run rpmlint on the spec file, the SRPM, and the i386 and x86_64 rpms, no errors, these are the only warnings: squeak-vm.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakV3.sources ../../../..//usr/share/squeak/SqueakV3.sources squeak-vm.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakV39.sources ../../../..//usr/share/squeak/SqueakV39.sources These links point to files in the squeak-image package, to be submitted for review as soon as I finish this review. These files are arch independent, as is all of squeak-image, except that for historical reasons squeak-image requires these packages to be in this arch dependent (under /usr/lib/) place. rpmlint, rightfully, doesn't like arch dependent files in a noarch package, so putting the files in an arch independent place (under /usr/share) in squeak-image, and haveing links to them from /usr/lib (or /usr/lib64) in squeak-vm (which is arch dependent). squeak-vm-nonXOplugins.i386: W: no-documentation This is a sub-package that is dependent on it's super-package and the super-package has doc. squeak-vm-nonXOplugins.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakFFIPrims Yes, it does have an executable-stack, it must. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review