Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194300 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-07 04:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Do you need to ship the docs for the compat package? Anyone who wants to do > development should just install the main package. Ok. > Again, I'd just dump the manpages. Ok. > E: compat-erlang non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/erlangR10B/erts-5.4.13/bin/start.src 0644 This is similar to an .in file, it used to create the real start script by the Install script. > E: compat-erlang non-readable > /usr/lib64/erlangR10B/lib/ssl-3.0.11/examples/certs/etc/otpCA/private/RAND 0660 These seem to be certificates. Obviously, they don't want to have this work readable, similarly to the files in /etc/pki/tls, I would say. > The only other thing I see is the directory name; are you sure you don't want to > put in a dash or something? There are plenty of directories in /usr/lib that > don't use a dash (expect5.43, python2.4, tk8.4) so it's surely not a blocker. Hmm, probably a dash would be better (also for the files in bin). The wings3d binary for Linux published by upstream packages the part of erlang and esdl, that is needed for running wings. This means that the expanded wings package only has 6.4M instead of over 114M for erlang alone. Shouldn't we do the same? In this case compat-erlang is only needed at compile time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review