Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curry - Münster Curry compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194011 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-07 04:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > "debug" is a different issue: Such libaries are rarely needed by anybody and > often are of doubtful benefits. One would have to check for for what they are > really needed and if shipping a "non-debug variant" isn't sufficient. In most > cases a "-O2 -g" compiled "non-debug" variant + debug-info-rpms render "debug > variants" superfluous. But with exotic compilers, one never knows. I looked into this a little deeper: libcurry.a is the normal runtime library, that is linked into every standalone program. libcurry_g.a is NOT the same library compiled using gcc -g, but contains the code for the declarative debugger of curry (this is similar to the standard debugger in Prolog). If you compile using "cyc --debug" this library is linked in addition to libcurry.a. I could imagine putting this library into a separate package curry-debugger or curry-debug. However, then cyc --debug fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review