Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194300 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-06 22:03 EST ------- I don't see anything out of line with the original review. I do see some oddities which you probably want to clean up, though. W: compat-erlang-doc wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/compat-erlang-doc-R10B/doc/highlights.html Do you need to ship the docs for the compat package? Anyone who wants to do development should just install the main package. A bunch of these: W: compat-erlang manpage-not-gzipped /usr/lib64/erlangR10B/man/man3/win32reg.3 Again, I'd just dump the manpages. E: compat-erlang non-executable-script /usr/lib64/erlangR10B/erts-5.4.13/bin/start.src 0644 Not sure what this is. E: compat-erlang non-readable /usr/lib64/erlangR10B/lib/ssl-3.0.11/examples/certs/etc/otpCA/private/RAND 0660 Nor this. The only other thing I see is the directory name; are you sure you don't want to put in a dash or something? There are plenty of directories in /usr/lib that don't use a dash (expect5.43, python2.4, tk8.4) so it's surely not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review