Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189374 ------- Additional Comments From notting@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-02 21:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Just did a quick mock build (development, x86_64). rpmlint is unhappy: > > W: jed prereq-use /sbin/install-info * Tue May 4 2004 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> 0.99.16-4 - remove info page (#115826) Oops. > W: jed buildprereq-use slang-devel >= 2.0, autoconf, libselinux-devel > > BuildRequires: should be used instead. Syntax changed. > W: jed hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root > > Please use %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > as the buildroot. Fixed. > W: jed patch-not-applied Patch3: jed-multilib.patch > > I assume you have reasons for not applying patch3. Didn't apply, forgot to remove it from the spec. > E: jed obsolete-not-provided jed-common > E: jed obsolete-not-provided jed-xjed > > You should provide these so that upgrades work and so that any packages which > might depend on them don't break. These were obsoleted in 2002. Nothing should require them. (And, technically, it doens't really obsolete xjed - we just stopped building it because it's a bad idea.) > E: jed binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/jed ['/usr/lib64'] > > rpath is bad and should be removed if at all possible. I'll dig into this > further if necessary. Nah, I'll dig it out. Probably bad autoconf somewhere. > W: jed doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/jed-0.99.18/doc/tm/rtl/tm-sort.sl > /usr/bin/env > W: jed doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/jed-0.99.18/doc/tm/rtl/whatelse.sl > /usr/bin/env > > Documentation should not be executable. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review