Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189374 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-02 13:57 EST ------- Just did a quick mock build (development, x86_64). rpmlint is unhappy: W: jed prereq-use /sbin/install-info I see the Prereq: but I don't see any calls to install-info. The scriptlets at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-117e9450bc166ceb4251bf8d87a9dd4e862442a4 should be used to install info pages; Prereq: should not be used in any case; Requires(pre): is preferred. W: jed buildprereq-use slang-devel >= 2.0, autoconf, libselinux-devel BuildRequires: should be used instead. E: jed broken-syntax-in-scriptlet-requires BuildPrereq: slang-devel >= 2.0, autoconf, libselinux-devel Not sure what's up here; it will probably go away when you switch to BuildRequires: W: jed hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root Please use %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) as the buildroot. W: jed patch-not-applied Patch3: jed-multilib.patch I assume you have reasons for not applying patch3. E: jed obsolete-not-provided jed-common E: jed obsolete-not-provided jed-xjed You should provide these so that upgrades work and so that any packages which might depend on them don't break. E: jed binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/jed ['/usr/lib64'] rpath is bad and should be removed if at all possible. I'll dig into this further if necessary. W: jed doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/jed-0.99.18/doc/tm/rtl/tm-sort.sl /usr/bin/env W: jed doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/jed-0.99.18/doc/tm/rtl/whatelse.sl /usr/bin/env Documentation should not be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review