Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192043 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-02 19:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Would it be ok to BR: /usr/bin/tex? Then this doesn't have to change in > the spec-file between FC5 and FC6. The current texinfo package in FC4 and FC5 provides texinfo-tex, so there should be no need for a separate spec for those releases. > I can move them to site-lisp if you want. I don't think it makes much difference either way, but if it's easy then it would be more consistent to do it that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review