Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192043 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-02 16:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The SRPM link seems wrong; I found > http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/ucblogo-5.5-2.src.rpm which I > hope is correct. Yes, it is. > The build fails due tue to lack of /usr/bin/tex; I think this is part of the > texinfo-tex thing. I changed to BR: texinfo-tex and things seem to build fine. Would it be ok to BR: /usr/bin/tex? Then this doesn't have to change in the spec-file between FC5 and FC6. > > I wonder if it's a good idea to just drop a file into > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/ without owning that directory. I > checked what other packages do and the examples I found seem to own it. Ok. > Most > also seem to drop the .el files into /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp instead of > keeping them with the package as ucblogo does, but I don't think this is a problem. I can move them to site-lisp if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review