[Bug 192043] Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192043





------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-06-02 16:38 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> The SRPM link seems wrong; I found
> http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/ucblogo-5.5-2.src.rpm which I
> hope is correct.
Yes, it is.

> The build fails due tue to lack of /usr/bin/tex; I think this is part of the
> texinfo-tex thing.  I changed to BR: texinfo-tex and things seem to build fine.
Would it be ok to BR: /usr/bin/tex? Then this doesn't have to change in
the spec-file between FC5 and FC6.
> 
> I wonder if it's a good idea to just drop a file into
> /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/ without owning that directory.  I
> checked what other packages do and the examples I found seem to own it.
Ok.
>  Most
> also seem to drop the .el files into /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp instead of
> keeping them with the package as ucblogo does, but I don't think this is a
problem.
I can move them to site-lisp if you want.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]