Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192043 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-06-03 06:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Would it be ok to BR: /usr/bin/tex? Then this doesn't have to change in > > the spec-file between FC5 and FC6. > > The current texinfo package in FC4 and FC5 provides texinfo-tex, so there should > be no need for a separate spec for those releases. Ok. > > I can move them to site-lisp if you want. > > I don't think it makes much difference either way, but if it's easy then it > would be more consistent to do it that way. I leave it as it is. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/ucblogo-5.5-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review