Re: Low Latency vs. Real Time Kernel - actual latencies ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Does anybody know how exactly the actual lag time achieved is being
calculated? I would like to test my own kernel config to see what I'm
getting.

-klaatu

On 01/01/2015 08:51 AM, Brian Monroe wrote:
> I agree that we need lag to be less than 5ms with no xruns for serious
> musicians. It makes a difference.
> 
> I was chatting in #opensourcemusicians about the rt patch issue and someone
> threw this out there: http://www.funtoo.org/Kernel/configs/realtime
> 
> I'm smart enough to get what they're doing, but not smart enough to know if
> this is what we're already doing in Fedora or how it'll affect other
> security concerns. Also the settings listed for /etc/security/limits.conf
> is setting you up for a bad time.
> 
> They said they could get less than 1ms with no xruns (except at application
> startup) which sounds promising. Certainly if we're shooting for less than
> 5 ms instead of less than 1ms.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> music mailing list
> music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
> 

_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux