Re: Spin Approval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Jørn Lomax <northlomax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/12/2012 11:37, Brendan Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 12/08/2012 01:25 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6 December 2012 19:06, Christopher Antila
>>> <crantila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 5 December 2012 18:25:31 Brendan Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> <snip>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think specifically the browser was simply that Konqueror doesn't
>>> really work well enough and people would be surprised not to find a
>>> browser unless they were hoping for a /really/ focused system as it's
>>> such a central part of a computer system these days. (You could even
>>> make a case for it being important to audio production.)
>>>
>>> You can probably draw up three categories of stuff to be considered to
>>> various degrees:
>>> 1. Audio tools. As many as can realistically be put on there.
>>> 2. Non-audio tools that might have an audio creation use, e.g.
>>> Inkscape, webcam software (performance videos), that kind of thing.
>>> Lots of this is already in the base we build on anyway.
>>> 3. Things that people will be surprised if they don't find (i.e. you
>>> forget for a second you're on this specialist audio spin and try to do
>>> something a computer normally does). A browser is the most obvious, a
>>> package manager is less obvious, but of course the route by which they
>>> can add anything they do think they need. Probably everything in here
>>> is in the base we build on anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Or in conclusion:
>>>>
>>>> Let's waste our time on audio-specific things
>>>
>>> (a.k.a. 'me too')
>>>
>> I think we need to get this locked down by the 11th so all of this is
>> probably a little to late.
>>
>> I'm getting conflicting considerations regarding size and composition,
>> so I'll outline them here.
>>
>>   - Christopher Wickert has stated that a spin should serve a specific
>> purpose. Packages should be identified for removal that do not meet the
>> needs of the spin - so not really a size consideration, more about
>> concept (CC'ed Chris here in case I got this wrong).
>>
>>   - a recent email on the spins list indicated that space and bandwith
>> issues are real infrastructure concerns regarding the approval of spins
>> [1]. I don't know if this is more to do with the number of spins of if
>> this is something that each individual spin should also keep in mind.
>> I have asked the question on the list and will report back
>>
>>   - for the rest of use the final size of the spin doesn't seem to be an
>> issue, as long as we have everything we need by default. Having said
>> that, nice to have packages can be installed with relative ease post
>> install or into the liveuser overlay.
>>
>> As an exercise I ran a query on RPM's by size against the latest
>> compose. This was done in the live environment [2]. I haven't realy gone
>> through this yet and won't have time to do so until tomorrow.
>>
>> Any changes from here should be run past our wrangler. I imagine that
>> any significant additional packages added to the nightly kickstarts will
>> have to be run by the Spins SIG after the 11th. (Again Christoper this
>> is what I understand to be the case - please correct me if I'm wrong)
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/2012-December/002641.html
>> [2] http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/projects/fedora-jam-rpm-by-size.txt
>> _______________________________________________
>> music mailing list
>> music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
>
> Looking at that list, there is nothing shouting out "remove me". Not sure
> what is pulling in mysql-server though.

I could run an 'rpm -q --whatrequires' to figure that out. And even
though the freed space is small, I'd still like to see
'calligra-sheets', 'calligra-words' and 'calligra-stage' removed.

>
> Shutter and the fluid-soundfonts (because they are **huge**) are the only
> ones I can see myself *maybe* wanting to remove.
>
> But until we know the status for the approval, I don't think we should mess
> any more with the kickstart
>
> --
> Jørn Lomax
> Nestleder Studentutvalget NT-Fak
> CS Student University of Tromsø
> Blog: http://lurimax.posterous.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> music mailing list
> music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music



-- 
Twitter: http://twitter.com/znmeb; Computational Journalism Publishers
Workbench: http://znmeb.github.com/Computational-Journalism-Publishers-Workbench/

How the Hell can the lion sleep with all those people singing "A weem
oh way!" at the top of their lungs?
_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux