On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 03:40 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > Hello everyone. I needed Rosegarden for a class, and since CCRMA isn't > built for FC5 and x86_64, I attempted to build the CCRMA source package > myself. And discovered I needed the latest Rosegarden to build with GCC > 4.1, which changed to scons, which has some icky bugs, one of which I > fixed with a patch from Fernando I dug up on a mailing list, then I > discovered a bug in mock, etc... And since I went through all the effort > I submitted it to Extras. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 > > I did a lot of googling trying to find out if there was any activity as > far as merging CCRMA into Extras and found nothing recent. (It appears > this list was created shortly *after* I looked...) I had intended to > email Fernando directly but never got around to it. Heh. Oh well... :-) Too bad we did not coordinate efforts for this... I have rosegarden4 for fc5 now. > I could use some advice on what to do about the timing problem... (Been > meaning to take that up on Rosegarden's mailing list...) You are using just the regular Fedora kernels, right? They have HZ=250 which is regretful for this type of work (you mention that in bugzilla)... the Planet CCRMA kernels still using HZ=1000 :-p I tried booting into 2096_FC5 and yes, I get the warning. Other things I tried: setting it to rtc in rosegarden and upping the user frequency to 1024 (there is a /sys thing you can use to do this). The first time I tried to start rosegarden after that the system froze solid (reset button was the only way out). After rebooting rosegarden starts, but still issues the warning - but according to the messages it prints it appears to have switched to using rtc. Maybe we could do timing tests to confirm the resolution... I guess this is something to ask questions about in the rosegarden list. One thing to note is that the rtc preference (at least) is sticky, that is the next time I start rosegarden it shows that. Still, the messages printed suggest that rosegarden is first using "auto", and then switching to rtc. > I took it upon myself to slap up a quickie SIG page on the wiki: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/MediaProduction > > I chose the name Media Production. Media allows us to include video as > well (Cinelerra). Production emphasizes that distribution and > consumption (patented codecs, media players, PVRs, streaming servers...) > do not fall directly under the SIG's focus. > > So does "Media Production SIG" sound good to everyone? Sounds good to me. That has always been the focus of Planet CCRMA (ie: creating content). > I've been doing my best to hurry up the review of jack. Its finals > week(s) so I'm busy, sleep deprived, and stressed out, however one of my > finals *is* for Digital Synth & Composition, so I can justify spending > at least some time on audio stuff. :) Yep, jack is in the critical path of a lot of packages. -- Fernando _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
