On 06/08/2016 03:54 PM, Brian Proffitt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Justin W. Flory <jflory7@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jflory7@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: On 06/01/2016 05:23 PM, Brian Proffitt wrote: Not sure about number of people, but there should be at least one person assigned as "caretaker" at all times, and then each channel would have their own policy to figure out who else has moderator/poster status. This should be very small scale. A database like rattic should store the passwords and then assign each user only the passwords to which they are authorized. The trick here is a universal policy for the "caretaker" Who is it? How are transitions handled? These are really governance questions that have to be answered in case someone leaves the project(s). BKP Sorry, lost track of this email chain until now… would it be possible to have multiple caretakers? I feel like it might be a good thing to have in place long-term if there were two to three caretakers set up to manage these. We could create a ticket and put some ideas to a vote if that would help move this forward in terms of deciding on a policy. Yes, we can easily have multiple caretakers. And I like the idea of putting this out for a vote. BKP [snip]
Hey all, sorry for the late follow-up here. But I have a ticket created for this topic and have it added to our meeting agenda for tomorrow.
https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/229
Please take a minute to review the ticket if you can and add any
thoughts / feedback to this. Otherwise, we'll discuss tomorrow!
-- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora Marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
