On 06/08/2016 03:48 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 8 Jun 2016 19:30, "Sylvia Sánchez" <lailahfsf@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lailahfsf@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:Hi Justin! I would say it needs an image or two. Besides that, I find it perfect.The last I recall from the previous editorial meeting is that the graphical update method would not be highlighted as a primary supported update and would at best be a "this thing is coming soon" target... Then a later more detailed article would be published to coincide with FESCO being happy with that as a supported update method. We should check with FESCO on this before publishing as nirik was pretty clear I thought that we should not publish such an article until they give the go ahead.
Hey James, I thought the decision would be to highlight this for upgrading as long as it was ready, tested, tried, and true. In either case, including this method in the article is completely dependent on the FESCo decision, and in the event that it is not ready in time for release, we will modify and strip this part of the article out.
We definitely will not publish this method unless we have a clear answer from FESCo and can be assured that the large majority of users will be able to upgrade using this method successfully. For now, the way the article is structured, it will be easy to remove this method if it isn't ready.
-- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora Marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
