Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can
> we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?
> 
> This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.
> 
> If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not
> be published.

Agreed, and it's incumbent on whoever schedules a post to confirm it's
meant to go out.  The bar is higher for articles about what we
deliver, as opposed to helpful how-to articles.  It's hard to see how
a premature article like that would cause any issues, but clearly this
one could.

Also, this was picked up by at least one venue that checks our feeds
for reportable news:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Cloud-32-bit-Dead

Does someone have a contact with Phoronix so we could explain the
snafu here?

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux