On 22 April 2016 at 09:52, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can >> we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future? >> >> This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken. >> >> If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not >> be published. > > Agreed, and it's incumbent on whoever schedules a post to confirm it's > meant to go out. The bar is higher for articles about what we > deliver, as opposed to helpful how-to articles. It's hard to see how > a premature article like that would cause any issues, but clearly this > one could. > >From past experience on these sorts of things.. please spell out that this is 32-bit i386 and doesn't cover arm32 (not sure if there are cloud arm32 but people seem to freak out when the architecture is not mentioned). > Also, this was picked up by at least one venue that checks our feeds > for reportable news: > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Cloud-32-bit-Dead > > Does someone have a contact with Phoronix so we could explain the > snafu here? > > -- > Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ > gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 > http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ > The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
