=========================================== = Quick Summary = =========================================== 1) Why not both Magazine + CommBlog? 2) Magazine: Looking at other software 3) CommBlog: Contributors to give feedback =========================================== On 12/01/2015 08:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:36:50PM -0500, charles profitt wrote:Thanks for the feedback. I was looking at it from a different angle when writing it - more of a call to action for contributors to give feedback. Let me look at the other angle and see how I can change the point of view and add a few more options that have not been mentioned in that mailing list discussion.The "call to action" angle might be something for communityblog.fedoraproject.org?
I think maybe this could be a double post of sorts for the Magazine and the CommBlog?
For the Magazine, the article could have a focus on making users aware of other software that is available as an alternative to Shotwell, without necessarily saying the end is nigh for Shotwell. This way, users can be informed about possible alternatives and they might actually find something they like better anyways. This way, whenever Shotwell is faded out, we can easily refer back to this article in the future and say, "Here, look at these alternatives" too.
As for the CommBlog, there could be a shorter post for contributors explaining that feedback is needed and this is the opportunity to help shape an impact on the tool that is shipped by default with Fedora and so on. The CommBlog article could also point to the Magazine article as a reference for checking out alternatives.
This is my take on it, what do you all think? -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
