On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 05:40:49PM -0500, charles profitt wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I just finished a draft of an Article about the discussion concerning > the potential replacement of Shotwell in future versions of Fedora. > > You will need to log in with your FAS account[1] before you can view > the article. > > https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=11005&preview_id=11005&preview=true > > I think I have covered the major points in the thread and the two > potential replacements that have been mentioned. I was not sure about > referencing a similar previous look at image viewers that was in Fedora > Magazine in 2014. > > https://fedoramagazine.org/17-alternatives-to-your-default-image-viewer > -on-fedora/ > > This is potentially my first article for Fedora Magazine so I welcome > all feedback. > > ref > --- > [1] - http://fedoramagazine.org/logging-into-fedora-magazine-with-fas/ I read this draft but I wasn't sure how this figured into our publishing strategy for the coming weeks. Personally I think a story that says "we don't know yet what the next photo app will be, or if there'll be one" isn't very interesting for the audience. I don't think it's helpful to direct thousands of readers to a conversation where they don't have a lot of context. It's more useful to me to have a newer look at image viewers than the previous article. People already know they have choices, maybe a good revision would be to show them updates there? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
