Re: Muktware: Red Hat Clarifies Doubt Over UEFI Secure Boot Solution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Jan Wildeboer <jwildebo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, this is not an ideal solution. And that is what Matt Garrett said from
> teh start. If we would not have a solution however, it would mean that
> Fedora cannot be installed *at all* on newer hardware.
>
> While we do not like the UEFI architecture, we have a responsibility towards
> our users (and the community at large, never forget that!) that in this case
> leads us to a pragmatic solution that works for the moment, giving us more
> time to work on a better solution.

Debian Project, FreeBSD team, OpenBSD team, NetBSD team, Linux Mint,
Mageia, Ubuntu... is not firm this, this is a solution at this moment,
and not making deals with mobsters, I think :D

I believe, that as Fedora is "test camp" of RHEL, so, (What's end
users use JBoss, Pyme solutions, VirtSandbox...et?). RedHat doesn't
want that RHEL 7 can be affected for this. (Is only a guess)

-- 
Álvaro Castillo

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys
Linux user #547784
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux