Re: Muktware: Red Hat Clarifies Doubt Over UEFI Secure Boot Solution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Note: this is my *personal* opinion, not the official Red Hat or Fedora position.

On 06.06.2012 12:56, Álvaro Castillo wrote:

If good, FSF would not started a campaign vs with this.

Yes, this is not an ideal solution. And that is what Matt Garrett said from teh start. If we would not have a solution however, it would mean that Fedora cannot be installed *at all* on newer hardware.

While we do not like the UEFI architecture, we have a responsibility towards our users (and the community at large, never forget that!) that in this case leads us to a pragmatic solution that works for the moment, giving us more time to work on a better solution.

Note: this is my *personal* opinion, not the official Red Hat or Fedora position.

Jan

--
Jan H Wildeboer                |
EMEA Open Source Affairs       | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH                   | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23 249
Technopark II, Haus C          | Fax:    +49 (0)89 205071-111
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 |
85630 Grasbrunn                |
_____________________________________________________________________

Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH,
Technopark II, Haus C, Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15
85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mark Hegarty, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham,
Charles Cachera
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux