On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm personally happy that Microsoft contributed code to the kernel. This just goes on to show that Open Source is worth the effort even for proprietary shops.
Hey All,
While this isn't 100% Fedora related, being such fans of upstream that
we are, we can definitely go somewhere with this. You've probably seen
in the news by now that Microsoft is making a pretty substantial
contribution to the Linux kernel.
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2009/Jul09/07-20LinuxQA.mspx
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10290686-16.html
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/072009-microsoft-linux-source-code.html
And if you need a good laugh:
http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/07/20/1643251/Microsoft-Releases-Linux-Device-Drivers-As-GPL
The way i see it, is that we can do one or more of several things
based on this. Of course we can continue talking about upstream as a
path to success, but i'm wondering, being no marketing expert myself,
what else can we do with such a message? Is this a message we can try
to take around to various different people and push extensively as
proof that the system works?
I'm personally happy that Microsoft contributed code to the kernel. This just goes on to show that Open Source is worth the effort even for proprietary shops.
Is this even something we can take to
mainstream media even though we're so fond of staying out of it for
the very minimal real effect we have?
Or do we ignore it because it's not Fedora?
Cheers,
Yaakov
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
--
Heherson Pagcaliwagan
http://www.azneita.org
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
