On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 00:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Max Spevack wrote: > > > > > Well, among other things, we get lots of interview requests from various > > publications, websites, etc. Most of those requests come around the > > time of the Fedora release, or whenever we have some sort of big Fedora > > announcement to make. > > Do we notify (potentially) interested parties and explain to them the > impact of some of the announcements we are making and why they are > important/relevant etc? > > Let me give a specific recent example here: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-April/msg00011.html > > Without a solid understanding of the governance model of Fedora, how Red > Hat has participating historically and how this is changing over a > period of time, the higher relevance of this announcement might just be > lost. Increasing our number of elected seats makes the project feel more democratic, and recognizes our community makeup. I'm curious to whom outside our community that has a higher relevance. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
