Il giorno 23/ago/06, alle ore 00:37, Max Spevack ha scritto:
I've said you didn't answer the question because you, trying to avoid any kind of "attack" or give the littlest aperture to "distro wars" makers, didn't get inside the analisys of your Ubuntu experience telling us what you like and what not about how the distro was "summoned up" {damn, i don't have a dictionary at hand and i miss some words, hope you understand me}.
I'd like to read "Fedora does not encourage, endorse or include" .... leaving open some doors. In any case in the mail exchange with Raul i've said that I'd like to see a more consistend distribution of software into an handful of repo, and not the actual plethora, never said that Fedora should include mp3 proprietary codec or whatever :-)
Yes, 14. Essentially the one's available in FedoraTracker's list, avoiding ATrpms and JPackage which gave me problems several times.
In this way i can have, test and use a bigger list of "free" software. The virtual PDF printer, the multimedia player .... the external repos take care of the "desiderata" packages in Extras and them some more.
Yes, indeed. And that's why i am discussing it :-) -- Nicola .:kOoLiNuS:. Losito |
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list