2006/4/20, Andre Nogueira <andre.nogueira.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>: > On 4/20/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > That is no longer based on Fedora. That includes parts of Fedora, but > > adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora. Get the package in > > Extras (; > > That also solves the problem of a distro wanting to use proprietary > software (which isn't acceptable in Fedora), while the rest is based > on Fedora. (Eg, a distro which includes Acrobat Reader, but appart > from that only includes Fedora packages). > > Otherwise, how would you distinguish an "almost" Fedora-based distro > which includes proprietary packages, from another which includes free > packages that are not in Fedora or Fedora Extras? > > Thanks, > > Andre well that was exactly my question... what terms are "legal"... i am neither a lawyer nor do i want to consult one at this point :). regards, Rudolf Kastl > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list > -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
