2006/4/20, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:03 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > > but just a question... what if i add a single package that isnt yet in > > extras nor core... am i not allowed to call it "based on fedora" with > > only minor changes that are documented in a clean way? > > with having a distro that is 99,9% fedora (e.g. a live cd... e.g. with > > distcc...) wouldnt it be still based on fedora from a pure technical > > point of view? > > How would i be able to call that live cd then? > > That is no longer based on Fedora. That includes parts of Fedora, but > adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora. Get the package in > Extras (; but its still derived from fedora isnt it? distcc is hanging idle in bugzilla for ages :) someone finish the review. regards, Rudolf Kastl > > -- > Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) > Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) > GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQBER84+4v2HLvE71NURAvs8AJ9rRMEFj7UlWdPFSfuOFkwZc1HfiQCgvL/Z > F7w4E343p6FGl6TEZjrxejc= > =Efy5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list > > -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
