On 4/20/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That is no longer based on Fedora. That includes parts of Fedora, but > adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora. Get the package in > Extras (; That also solves the problem of a distro wanting to use proprietary software (which isn't acceptable in Fedora), while the rest is based on Fedora. (Eg, a distro which includes Acrobat Reader, but appart from that only includes Fedora packages). Otherwise, how would you distinguish an "almost" Fedora-based distro which includes proprietary packages, from another which includes free packages that are not in Fedora or Fedora Extras? Thanks, Andre -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
