On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 03:31 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote: > If you wish to write a guide for > the alternates, you must keep this in mind. I would strongly encourage > you to work with someone on the Docs Project if you wish to do this. Formal Fedora documentation is only about what ships in Fedora, regardless of legal obstacles. Ask me again in a few years about documenting things outside of Core and Extras, once we have all the good stuff included. How about this as a non-solution? Toshio can write up an explanation of how media players work with plug-ins, and post that as a Wiki page. Nothing explicit about third-parties and patents, just that it is extensible and how it works/what to look for. This solves the problem of trying to show users what their tools can do. If they want to use that tool for something illegal, such as playing music too loudly after local quiet hours are enforced ... Perhaps somewhere in FedoraMyths there could be a link from "supported players" to this page. Standard useful linking to useful information. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
