On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 23:54 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote: > The only real problem with those new changes is that ForbiddenItems does > not and will not point users to other third-party plugins. The > technologies it refers to are part of Fedora Core and Extras, and it > will not point to sources for proprietary plugins. It only makes a > vague reference to using Google. That last bit of your changes will > only serve to mislead users who may already be frustrated. Because of > this, I will remove that small bit. There's both the bit about google and the bit about checking fedorafaq.org. IMHO we have to address the fact that people may need to use a specific format rather than an alternate. To do that we have to let them know that they can install plugins from third parties to make that happen. This can either be through the methods suggested at the bottom of ForbiddenItems (indirect and possibly frustrating but it gets people to scan through the list of legal problems and their OSS alternatives on their way to a solution) or by placing some portion of that information directly in FedoraMyths (such as my original suggestion. Can you come up with some variant of that which satisfies your desire to not duplicate information on ForbiddenItems?) -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
