On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 12:46 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 8/21/05, Toshio Kuratomi <toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The ForbiddenItems page is much more explicit: > > Of course, the logical followup is: But I want to get foo and do bar, > > how can I do one of the items listed above? > > > > The unofficial [WWW]http://fedorafaq.org provides useful answers on > > commonly asked questions. > > You can reference fedorafaq.org and call it a place to find answers > for common questions.. but you can not explictly state which questions > it answers. Thats the line. > If this wording passed legal, I'm not going to try to find fault with it :-) > How about instead of trying to re-interpret or expand on what the > forbiddenitems text as written, we either site the link or quote it > verbatim and leave it at that. Any expansion beyond the exact text as > written in the forbiddenitem page is going to need legal review. If > the text of the forbiddenitems page has room for improvement we should > inmprove the text on that page and use it as the cananoical > explanation in all other communication mediums. > That would be excellent. I would agree with either of those approaches. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
