On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: > Do you feel that yum is ready to work as fast or regarding dependancies > ready to handle a one-cd situation? I've used both yum and apt and it > seems that apt with rpms is still more efficient in processing the data > required. Maybe thats just me I'm not sure. > > I personally believe a 1 cd install is a must since most people always > complain of the 'bloatedness' of Fedora. They always point to ubuntu as > say thats what it needs to be like fast and efficient. > > I can see their point if they are a desktop user however I don't see > their point if they want to setup a server. I personally always > download the dvd's for the pure sake that its one cd and its got > everything I personally need on it. Well, a "desktop" should easily fit on a single CD, and yes, that's really what we want. BTW, I've been always wondering: do all these people that like single CDs have broadband to download hundreds of megs of extra stuff? Or they do not anything that is not on the CD? > Regards, > > > Marc --behdad http://behdad.org/ -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
