On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: > One thing that has frustrated me is that we seem before to have just > turned a blind eye to the whole lot even though we know its there. Only > now are we making it clearer as to the reasons why mp3's and the > propietary software are not supported. Better late than never, and hard to do everything right the first time. > However let me ask this is it illegal to add a 3rd party repo or is it > only illegal if the content on it is wrong? It's *probably* illegal to add 3rd party repos that we know to include infringing content -- because that would be the same as *knowingly directing users to illegal content*. Because most 3rd party repos don't care much about these issues (largely because they don't have to), it's too risky for us to refer users directly to these repos. > I'm not being stupid I don't understand where the line is because I'm > lucky we don't have that law in Australia at the moment I'm sure that will > change. Part of the problem is that the line isn't bright and clear. For that reason, we will be quite conservative in the decisions we make abut what might infringe. --g _____________________ ____________________________________________ Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the ] [ dumb. --mcluhan -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list