Re: Fedora review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:

> One thing that has frustrated me is that we seem before to have just
> turned a blind eye to the whole lot even though we know its there.  Only
> now are we making it clearer as to the reasons why mp3's and the
> propietary software are not supported.

Better late than never, and hard to do everything right the first time.
 
> However let me ask this is it illegal to add a 3rd party repo or is it
> only illegal if the content on it is wrong?

It's *probably* illegal to add 3rd party repos that we know to include
infringing content -- because that would be the same as *knowingly
directing users to illegal content*.  Because most 3rd party repos don't
care much about these issues (largely because they don't have to), it's
too risky for us to refer users directly to these repos.

> I'm not being stupid I don't understand where the line is because I'm
> lucky we don't have that law in Australia at the moment I'm sure that will
> change.

Part of the problem is that the line isn't bright and clear.  For that 
reason, we will be quite conservative in the decisions we make abut what 
might infringe.

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan


--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux