Re: Fedora review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 19.07.2005, 00:08 -0400 schrieb Christopher Aillon:

> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems
> > 
> 
> But obviously they weren't answered for the review author.  So there
> is a problem in our getting the message out.  What good is the wiki if
> its not helping our users?

I think what lacks is a solution. It is ok for Fedora to not distribute
MP3 stuff. What i would like to see is to have an installer for enabling
external yum repositories. So like from up2date one could choose: "add
external sources". The list could be updated via web - and then there
would be no problem, because only the enabling software is distributed.
I do not understand why this opportunity is not provided. I guess this
could be very easy. 

I think in marketing the answer not always should be RTFM but do
soemthing about things that are obviously problematic. So some
discussion from marketing to development.

-- 
http://www.alternativ.net/~vinci
Jabber: vinci@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux