On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 00:21 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:16:14AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems > > > But obviously they weren't answered for the review author. So there is a > > > problem in our getting the message out. What good is the wiki if its not > > > helping our users? > > Hmmm -- the default firefox bookmarks in uptates/testing/3 seem to still be > > "Red Hat, Inc.", "Red Hat Network", "Red Hat Linux Documentation", etc. > > Maybe the Fedora Wiki could be there instead? > > PS: serious suggestion, not just being a smartass because you're the > maintainer of that package. :) It's a good suggestion. AFAIK, we are now clear to link to fedorafaq.org and other sites that themselves link to information that is non-free or possibly infringing on patents. We cannot link directly to such possibly-infringing sites. For these bookmarks, here are a few I'd add. Matt, do you want to file the RFE? :) fedorafaq.org fedorausers.org fedoralinks.org fedora.redhat.com/docs fedoraproject.org/wiki fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
