> I think the sequential-non-annual numbering is going to be confusing to > some people. Maybe that's intended. However, maybe the next one here > should be "Boston FUDCon 2006" rather than FUDCon4 or whatever. I would also point out that we were extremely inconsistent with the naming of that first event. Half of our literature said "FUDCon 2005" and half said "FUDCon1". So I guess we've already provided our own precedent if we want to move forward with the "annual" names. - Paul -- Paul Stauffer <paulds@xxxxxx> Manager of Research Computing Computer Science Department Boston University