On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 18:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:51:42AM -0700, Colin Charles wrote: > > > There is great interest at doing it again at BU next year. And we were > > > thinking the "more serious" thing. > > Very sweet. BU were great hosts this year, and I'm sure they'll be great > > next year too! And locality towards Westford make it all the more > > sensible for FUDConN to be there (at the rate we're going, N might be 4 > > or 5 by then!) > > And if its the "more serious" thing, we can't pull off 5 a year! erps, > > Of course, we can.. we just need a correct marketing twist to it > > I think the sequential-non-annual numbering is going to be confusing to some > people. Maybe that's intended. However, maybe the next one here should be > "Boston FUDCon 2006" rather than FUDCon4 or whatever. I agree. This naturally presumes a continued association with LWCE, which is probably a reasonable assumption. Two in the US is probably enough for now. Cuts down the intracontinental crossing that is expensive and time *yawn* consuming. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
