On 6/10/05, Paul Stauffer <paulds@xxxxxx> wrote: > I would also point out that we were extremely inconsistent with the naming > of that first event. Half of our literature said "FUDCon 2005" and half > said "FUDCon1". So I guess we've already provided our own precedent if we > want to move forward with the "annual" names. time to move to a consistent use of date +%s for all timestamps. -jef"date +%s, when stardates just arent geeky enough"spaleta