Le samedi 03 mars 2007 à 20:42 +0100, Axel Thimm a écrit : > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:32:17PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Please don't - fontconfig logic can be very different from distribution > > to distribution and release to release, fonts are *not* a good > > cross-distribution candidate unless you want to promote gigantic > > scriptlets > > OK, withdrawing fonts, then, I thought that it would had settled by > now. Basic install is fine - just dump the font files in the right dir For everything else you need to know the config langage grammar level your distro fontconfig understand, what are the default deployed conf files (conf file name matters as it's used to priorize), if the distro freetype ships with the patented bytecode interpreter or not, etc Plus explicit fontconfig setup is used to work around fontconfig/freetype/pango bugs, which are not the same everywhere It's getting better but not there yet -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
