Perfect. I'll fix the typo and call it good?
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:54:08 -0600 (CST), Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Actually, there was one other change. Previously, netpanzer and
>> netpanzer-data required equal versions of each other. This defeats the
>> purpose of separation of data and code. Aside from erroneously adding
>> the
>> disttag, I altered the Requires. netpanzer requires
>> netpanzer-data>=0.8,
>> and netpanzer >= 0.8. This allows netpanzer to be updated without
>> updating netpanzer-data, from this version forward. If we can just
>> remove
>> the most recent builds, I can repair the disttag and re-do the RQ
>> changes
>> and re-build. I assume I should re-increment the release number just to
>> be on the safe side?
>
> In other words, you want netpanzer-data-0.8-5.noarch.rpm from devel
> copied to FC-6 and FC-5.
>
> Between 0.8-5 and 0.8-6%{?dist} you did not change any Requires.
> No new build of netpanzer-data necessary.
>
> Only a fix in CVS, since the last commit contains this typo:
>
> -Release: 6%{?dist}
> +Release: 7%
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
--
novus ordo absurdum
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
