Sounds logical. I was unaware of this practice. How might I ((do
that)||(have it done))?
> Hi,
>
> I think the whole point of not having %{?dist} on this big noarch
> package, was to be able to build it only on one branch, then request a
> manual hardlinking to the other branches, to save all mirror servers
> some disk space.
>
> Matthias
>
> Jon Ciesla (limb) wrote :
>
>> Author: limb
>>
>> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/netpanzer-data/devel
>> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9375
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> netpanzer-data.spec
>> Log Message:
>> Fixed dist tag.
>>
>>
>>
>> Index: netpanzer-data.spec
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/netpanzer-data/devel/netpanzer-data.spec,v
>> retrieving revision 1.3
>> retrieving revision 1.4
>> diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
>> --- netpanzer-data.spec 1 Mar 2007 20:28:58 -0000 1.3
>> +++ netpanzer-data.spec 2 Mar 2007 12:44:09 -0000 1.4
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> Name: netpanzer-data
>> Version: 0.8
>> -Release: 5
>> +Release: 6%{?dist}
>> Summary: Data files for netpanzer
>>
>> Group: Amusements/Games
>> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@
>>
>>
>> %changelog
>> +* Fri Mar 01 2007 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 0.8-6
>> +- Added dist tag
>> +
>> * Thu Mar 01 2007 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 0.8-5
>> - Change netpanzer RQ to allow for update of app without update of data
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
> Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6
> Load : 0.40 0.43 0.29
>
--
novus ordo absurdum
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
