Ville Skyttä wrote : > As a side note, I most likely will be interested in maintaining some EPEL5 > packages later, but probably not EPEL4. This shows up a problem with the current situation : Some people could be wanting to maintain some of your packagers for the older RHEL releases which you won't be interested in, but this can't be perfectly handled (i.e. have a complete different owners, like for Fedora vs. RHEL), and _could_ be fixed by co-maintainership... yet if someone it interested in, say, EL2.1 in general, it would be quite difficult and wouldn't make much sense to have him co-maintaining hundreds of packages... Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 Load : 0.31 0.38 0.29 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
