On Sunday 25 February 2007, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Author: ausil > > Update of /cvs/extras/owners > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8651 > > Modified Files: > owners.epel.list > Log Message: > add missing items from EPEL list Looks like this was done without asking the respective package owners whether they're interested in maintaining those packages in EPEL. I know I wasn't asked, yet rpmlint and rpmdevtools were imported by someone else but assigned to me. Please don't do that - in worst cases that may mean the packages are effectively unmaintained as the reports go to people who have no plans to do anything about them. There were also some "branched for infrastructure" commits lately; were the newly added EPEL owners asked in those cases? As a side note, I most likely will be interested in maintaining some EPEL5 packages later, but probably not EPEL4. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
