Re: EPEL owners

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 25 February 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Ville Skyttä schrieb:
> > On Sunday 25 February 2007, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > Looks like this was done without asking the respective package owners
> > whether they're interested in maintaining those packages in EPEL.  I know
> > I wasn't asked, yet rpmlint and rpmdevtools were imported by someone else
> > but assigned to me. [...]
>
> I suppose this was an error, and I suppose this error is limited to
> those two packages. Those two are quite crucial to because most of us
> use them to (test-) build package builds on EL. So those were in the
> first bunch of test-packages that got build in the testing phase. All
> the other packages should afaik have been build only when the Fedora
> maintainer asked for a EPEL branch.
>
> I'm willing to take the two if you don't want them and if that's okay
> for you.

Thanks, go ahead, and feel free to include me in initial Cc list; as said I 
may be interested in chiming in more actively later.  And see also 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/229975
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/229976
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/227284

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux