On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:30:10 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Raises the question why there is a draft on making a specific BuildRoot > > mandatory? > > Because of the lag between a patch being submitted and a build made with patch > or a release made with patch. So, the "upstream" rule here is violated. Instead, you want to change thousands of spec files because of a theoretical problem that can only affect users who don't set up a per user build environment on a multi-user system? Loyalty finds an end here. The mktemp buildroot in spec files would be really disappointing decision. $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-6 $ rpm --eval %_tmppath /var/tmp could be modified more quickly than applying a bigger buildroot patch to the code. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
