On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 12:43 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "CM" == Caolan McNamara <caolanm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > CM> I mean, I don't *really* mind making 27 separate package reviews, > CM> but we've got a lot of package reviews outstanding already and it > CM> just seems a little time-consuming to rinse and repeat so many > CM> times rather than handle them all as one single request. > > We really want to have a review URL to put in the package database, > and I don't know that we've ever allowed multiple packages to be > reviewed in a single ticket. > > So rather than having to go through a bunch of discussion to make new > policy, it might just be simpler for someone to review the first one, > then waste ten minutes in front of bugzilla entering "This is packaged > identically to the first one; see (URL). APPROVED". (Of course, they > should be checking to make sure that's actually the case.) sure. not a problem. I'll pause on the first dict, and mirror any required changed into the other and pile them on afterwards. C. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
