Caolan McNamara schrieb: > So, what I want to do is split out the hunspell dictionaries from > openoffice.org into separate packages for each dictionary so we don't > have to re-build them for each OOo respin, or re-download them for that > matter, etc etc. > > To that end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227811 > is the Afrikaans dict. The question is, can I avoid having to making 27 > extra review requests for the remaining dictionaries that I want to > split out of OOo (http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/) and get a > sort of blanket approval based off the Afrikaans dict review ? My 2 cent: - search a reviewer of the Afrikaans dict review that is willig to work on you on the other dicts, too - finish the Afrikaans dict review - open review bugs for all the others, too -- at least the license IMHO should be checked by the reviewer, and that way proper tracking is possible later, too; reviewing should be not much more then running a diff (and looking at the differences), checking the license and the md5sum for the initial reviewer -> should be easy to do CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
