Re: hunspell dictionaries, do I have to make 28 review request ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 12:24 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Caolan McNamara (caolanm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > To that end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227811
> > is the Afrikaans dict. The question is, can I avoid having to making 27
> > extra review requests for the remaining dictionaries that I want to
> > split out of OOo (http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/) and get a
> > sort of blanket approval based off the Afrikaans dict review ?
> 
> Is it essentially templated?

Yeah, they're all essentially the same, except the license differs as
LGPL/GPL/BSD from case to case. rpmdiff is silent on all of them.

I mean, I don't *really* mind making 27 separate package reviews, but
we've got a lot of package reviews outstanding already and it just seems
a little time-consuming to rinse and repeat so many times rather than
handle them all as one single request.

C.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux