Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:08:22PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> Even though your Conflicts is correct (ie, not wrong), Michael's >> suggestion of using (versinoed) Obsoletes in this case is, imo, a better >> option. > > That's what I used. If Ralf doesn't raise any concern I'll keep the > versionned obsoletes. I just checked cvs, and the latest devel/lesstif.spec includes # obsolete older openmotif. May hurt third party repos Obsoletes: openmotif <= 2.3.0-0.2.1 which is way not right. See my comments in the package review: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/203274#c11 (item 1) It's seems to have been added due to http://bugzilla.redhat.com/221083 But that only ever referred to -devel conflicts. For now, it is my strong opinion that *at most*, only openmotif-devel should be Obsoleted, but not the runtime. It *may* be ok, to Obsoletes: openmotif21 since it genuinely conflicts (same soname), see http://bugzilla.redhat.com/215560 -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
