Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 05:21:23PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> Incomplete. Ought to be: >> >> Obsoletes: openmotif <= 2.3.0-0.2.1 > > This is not strictly required, but not doing that could lead to trouble > later when the lesstif sonames are bumped in the future, and considering > that the -devel package will obsolete older openmotif this is not that > problematic, and it will get rid of old fedora openmotif. > >> Obsoletes: openmotif-devel <= 2.3.0-0.2.1 >> >> I like it, FWIW. ;-) > > Once agin I dislike it because there are certainly scenarios for which > it will really bother third party repo openmotif packaging. As far as we (Fedora) are concerned, lesstif-devel *does* effectively Obsoletes: openmotif-devel Even though your Conflicts is correct (ie, not wrong), Michael's suggestion of using (versinoed) Obsoletes in this case is, imo, a better option. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list