On Tuesday, 02 January 2007 at 13:59, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 13:43 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:08:22PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > > > Even though your Conflicts is correct (ie, not wrong), Michael's suggestion > > > of using (versinoed) Obsoletes in this case is, imo, a better option. > > > > That's what I used. If Ralf doesn't raise any concern I'll keep the versionned > > obsoletes. > Well, you know very well, that I consider your way of packaging lesstif > to be broken, because OpenMotif-devel and Lesstif-devel must be > installable in parallel. Any such Obsoletes breaks this. > > Besides this, it should be more important to you to fix lesstif in a way > major apps such as ddd and nedit are functional again. There's also this bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216160 Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
