On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:54:04 -0500, Michel Salim wrote: > > They were only available for Fedora > > Extras 3, so my guess is that they came from Fedora.us days and Jose > > never signed the CLA. > > > Just checked and there's no Bugzilla entry for the review request. > tetex-beamer *is* listed in owners.list, though. > > Should I ask for a review of the updated package, and only after it > pass request the branches? jpo is an active FE contributor. I suggest you talk to him first as there may be a reason that the package has not been published for FC-4 and newer. > (and what happens if one were to run cvs-import.sh and the package is > already in the tree, but does not have a -devel branch, as is the case > here) Probably it fails, because CVSROOT still lists rpms/tetex-beamer, but the directory is missing. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
